|
|
LAD/BOS
Jul 26, 2006 0:14:05 GMT -5
Post by Dankbud on Jul 26, 2006 0:14:05 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
LAD/BOS
Jul 26, 2006 0:20:26 GMT -5
Post by REX PENNEBAKER on Jul 26, 2006 0:20:26 GMT -5
Hmm, I usually am lenient when voting on here but this is rape. Bonderman's a #4 at best, Burns is an average closer at best, and McClung sucks ass I know first hand. The 1st rounder will yield very little, and 2nd rounders are irrelevant. Mathieson is still a #3 at worse, and Go's a #2. Veto.
|
|
|
|
LAD/BOS
Jul 26, 2006 0:28:35 GMT -5
Post by Dave on Jul 26, 2006 0:28:35 GMT -5
hahaha, burns sucks now.
veto.
|
|
|
|
LAD/BOS
Jul 26, 2006 0:28:56 GMT -5
Post by Bacon Drips on Jul 26, 2006 0:28:56 GMT -5
This is rape at it's finest, but Boston wants to rebuild. Pass
|
|
|
|
LAD/BOS
Jul 26, 2006 0:51:55 GMT -5
Post by GoldSlime35 on Jul 26, 2006 0:51:55 GMT -5
2 great SPs for crap.
Easy veto.
|
|
|
|
LAD/BOS
Jul 26, 2006 0:52:27 GMT -5
Post by Zappa on Jul 26, 2006 0:52:27 GMT -5
What the fuck, is GS back now? Make up your fucking mind.
|
|
|
|
LAD/BOS
Jul 26, 2006 0:52:31 GMT -5
Post by Are you ready? on Jul 26, 2006 0:52:31 GMT -5
Meh, pass.
|
|
|
|
LAD/BOS
Jul 26, 2006 5:57:31 GMT -5
Post by MagicMerlin7 on Jul 26, 2006 5:57:31 GMT -5
I never vote on trades, but this one seems terrible. Trading Go should bring back a 5.0 spec in return, and William burns, who is only serviceable as a closer doesn't count. If Boston wants to rebuild, they'll have no problem doing a different trade since these players are cheap and not old.
|
|
|
|
LAD/BOS
Jul 26, 2006 16:05:59 GMT -5
Post by Zappa on Jul 26, 2006 16:05:59 GMT -5
You oughtta keep it that way.  |
|
|
|
LAD/BOS
Jul 26, 2006 17:58:49 GMT -5
Post by Dave on Jul 26, 2006 17:58:49 GMT -5
i disagree, merlin needs to speak more. its you we need to shut up.
|
|
