|
PHI/LAD
Feb 27, 2006 23:47:54 GMT -5
Post by Dankbud on Feb 27, 2006 23:47:54 GMT -5
|
|
|
PHI/LAD
Feb 28, 2006 0:13:25 GMT -5
Post by The Boss on Feb 28, 2006 0:13:25 GMT -5
That'd be a big no.
|
|
|
PHI/LAD
Feb 28, 2006 0:16:20 GMT -5
Post by Zappa on Feb 28, 2006 0:16:20 GMT -5
Give reasons cockface, or else your opinion doesn't matter.
|
|
|
PHI/LAD
Feb 28, 2006 0:24:16 GMT -5
Post by Phoenix on Feb 28, 2006 0:24:16 GMT -5
Give reasons cockface, or else your opinion doesn't matter. because martin isn't going to develop. If he does, he'll be lucky to hit 40 contact. No
|
|
|
PHI/LAD
Feb 28, 2006 0:25:14 GMT -5
Post by Gene Starwind on Feb 28, 2006 0:25:14 GMT -5
guess we gots to redo it
|
|
|
PHI/LAD
Feb 28, 2006 0:26:06 GMT -5
Post by The Boss on Feb 28, 2006 0:26:06 GMT -5
I think it's pretty obvious why it's a veto, Zappa.
|
|
|
PHI/LAD
Feb 28, 2006 1:06:54 GMT -5
Post by Jabroni on Feb 28, 2006 1:06:54 GMT -5
pass
martin might not develop, but look how long dude's signed for.
|
|
|
PHI/LAD
Feb 28, 2006 6:54:59 GMT -5
Post by Zappa on Feb 28, 2006 6:54:59 GMT -5
Mota is an extra reliever Gene doesn't need. He's also very old. Its not like I'm trading for a top of the line reliever...
|
|
|
PHI/LAD
Feb 28, 2006 10:41:05 GMT -5
Post by GoldSlime35 on Feb 28, 2006 10:41:05 GMT -5
While Jabroni is right, Gene needs to get at least something halfway decent...like a 2.5 spec.
|
|
|
PHI/LAD
Feb 28, 2006 14:36:07 GMT -5
Post by Dankbud on Feb 28, 2006 14:36:07 GMT -5
i agree. if gene wants to give away mota then why not just cut him and let zap sign him. its not like gene cannot afford it.
veto.
|
|