|
|
LAD/ATL
Feb 13, 2006 22:20:04 GMT -5
Post by Dankbud on Feb 13, 2006 22:20:04 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
LAD/ATL
Feb 13, 2006 22:22:17 GMT -5
Post by GoldSlime35 on Feb 13, 2006 22:22:17 GMT -5
Umm....Colon sucks...
|
|
|
|
LAD/ATL
Feb 13, 2006 22:36:10 GMT -5
Post by Jabroni on Feb 13, 2006 22:36:10 GMT -5
the hell are you talking about? He pulled those sub 4 ERAs out of his ass?
|
|
|
|
LAD/ATL
Feb 13, 2006 22:38:23 GMT -5
Post by Zappa on Feb 13, 2006 22:38:23 GMT -5
7 stuff, 7 control, seems good to me as they're the two most important SP stats aside from endurance. Stop being so hard, NaziSlime. I thought we escaped those strict Third Reich-ish trade council days?
|
|
|
|
LAD/ATL
Feb 13, 2006 22:38:45 GMT -5
Post by Jabroni on Feb 13, 2006 22:38:45 GMT -5
8 stuff
|
|
|
|
LAD/ATL
Feb 13, 2006 22:46:49 GMT -5
Post by Gene Starwind on Feb 13, 2006 22:46:49 GMT -5
foul
|
|
|
|
LAD/ATL
Feb 13, 2006 22:51:39 GMT -5
Post by Jabroni on Feb 13, 2006 22:51:39 GMT -5
Passing SF/CHW but not this makes absolutely no sense.
|
|
|
|
LAD/ATL
Feb 13, 2006 22:52:47 GMT -5
Post by Phoenix on Feb 13, 2006 22:52:47 GMT -5
I don't see a problem with this.
|
|
|
|
LAD/ATL
Feb 13, 2006 22:54:51 GMT -5
Post by Gene Starwind on Feb 13, 2006 22:54:51 GMT -5
Passing SF/CHW but not this makes absolutely no sense. 7-5-8 reliever for a 7-7-3 hitter. I don't see a problem with it when factoring in their age and contracts. This on the other hand, isn't exactly even. |
|
|
|
LAD/ATL
Feb 13, 2006 22:57:12 GMT -5
Post by Jabroni on Feb 13, 2006 22:57:12 GMT -5
That reliever is also mediocre vs. righties, and is... a reliever. Collela is better than Feliz, but Colon doesn't have some huge righty split and is a starter, rather than a reliever.
|
|
|
|
LAD/ATL
Feb 13, 2006 23:01:07 GMT -5
Post by Zappa on Feb 13, 2006 23:01:07 GMT -5
Passing SF/CHW but not this makes absolutely no sense. 7-5-8 reliever for a 7-7-3 hitter. I don't see a problem with it when factoring in their age and contracts. This on the other hand, isn't exactly even. This is what fucking sucked about our council. OMGS, EVERYTHING NEEDS TO BE EVEN AND FAIR TO A FUCKING D. No, it doesn't. It just has to be fair "enough". I need Colon, he needs Colella. Both are decent, have decent ratings, I see why not. Do we nee to see a repeat of MIN/LAD and the whole Roman/EJ bullshit? |
|
|
|
LAD/ATL
Feb 13, 2006 23:04:57 GMT -5
Post by GoldSlime35 on Feb 13, 2006 23:04:57 GMT -5
Colon has low endurance and only two pitches.
Collella is pretty good.
|
|
|
|
LAD/ATL
Feb 13, 2006 23:06:51 GMT -5
Post by Gene Starwind on Feb 13, 2006 23:06:51 GMT -5
This is what fucking sucked about our council. OMGS, EVERYTHING NEEDS TO BE EVEN AND FAIR TO A FUCKING D. No, it doesn't. It just has to be fair "enough". I need Colon, he needs Colella. Both are decent, have decent ratings, I see why not. Do we nee to see a repeat of MIN/LAD and the whole Roman/EJ bullshit? Wrong. Trades don't have to be exactly fair, doofus. But they should be in the same neighborhood. Refer to GS's post. |
|
|
|
LAD/ATL
Feb 13, 2006 23:09:05 GMT -5
Post by Dankbud on Feb 13, 2006 23:09:05 GMT -5
while i can see that the low endurance and only having 2 pitches arent great for a starter but he does put up good numbers (which is just as important as ratings).
collela is just the opposite. good ratings but terrible stats. both woners have been around for a while and know what they are doing (filling needs). this trade is close enough and will pass.
|
|
