|
Post by Dankbud on Apr 7, 2005 10:57:27 GMT -5
I don't think teams with rich history should be able to move either but if the team really wants to then let them go for it. 4. I will eventually determine a date on which you can offer a player that is on your team and in the final year of his contract an extention. If you do not sign a player to an extention, when his contract is up you cannot bid on him until the designated FA period is over. Why can't we bid on our own players who went into FA if we didn't sign them to an extention? Phillies did it with Polanco and the Sox tried to get Pedro back but they failed. it has to do with the fact that there is the ability to franchise a player. but since i went a little further with the franchising (i.e. other teams can sign your franchised player) i am considering dropping this rule and allow a player that was not signed to an extension to be signed during the designated FA period by the former team.
|
|
|
Post by wsimpson on Apr 9, 2005 20:25:31 GMT -5
Is there going to be a salary cap or not?
|
|
|
Post by Dankbud on Apr 9, 2005 22:20:17 GMT -5
there will be one but it won't be enforced until next year due to the yanks being so far over.
luxury tax will not be used until the 2008 season.
|
|
|
Post by sosafan27 on Apr 17, 2005 9:58:16 GMT -5
great rules but the one thing that you did not specify is when we have to have our lineups in
|
|
|
Post by wsimpson on Apr 17, 2005 10:13:53 GMT -5
great rules but the one thing that you did not specify is when we have to have our lineups in Read #4 under general rules
|
|
|
Post by Gene Starwind on Jun 7, 2005 9:34:43 GMT -5
It'd be nice if you pointed out what you changed because I don't like reading things that long twice.
|
|
|
Post by Zappa on Jun 7, 2005 11:31:34 GMT -5
I just remembered...I don't like relocation. >_>
|
|
Winger
New Member
Baltimore Orioles
Posts: 19
|
Post by Winger on Nov 19, 2006 15:52:06 GMT -5
Are all these rules still up to date?
|
|
|
Post by Are you ready? on Feb 23, 2007 16:51:54 GMT -5
I want to apply for relocation kthxbi
|
|
|
Post by MagicMerlin7 on Feb 23, 2007 17:10:54 GMT -5
This is pretty much what I told Bacon Drips about relocating.
So you'll have to up the winning percentage if you want to relocate with Florida. I'll let the trade council vote on it once you have your proposal, but probably 72-75 wins for 3 straight years would be good enough for that team with 37 fan interest.
I'm also hoping very little teams relocate so I hope not everyone jumps on the relocate bandwagon because then I'll only let the teams with the most ambitious proposals (low fan interest minimum, high winning percentage) relocate then.
|
|
|
Post by MagicMerlin7 on Feb 23, 2007 17:12:33 GMT -5
So, my rules are a little different from Danks.
|
|
|
Post by Are you ready? on Feb 23, 2007 17:13:40 GMT -5
Why the hell does my team have to become good to relocate? My FI has been shit since I got here, that should be reason enough.
|
|
Booker Man
Junior Member
Cincinnati Reds
I respect you Booker man
Posts: 89
|
Post by Booker Man on Feb 23, 2007 17:23:28 GMT -5
i should relocate
|
|
|
Post by Yages on Feb 23, 2007 18:10:18 GMT -5
The big problem with relocation... is that every new (and/or stupid) manager with low support automatically wants to do it.
Forget about it. It's an idiotic waste of time (except in very rare cases). 99% of the time, all you have to do is field a halfway decent team and you'll have good fan support. Hell, I turned a Toronto team that set the losses record into a juggernaut in the space of three seasons, and I immediately had fan support in the nineties.
|
|
|
Post by Gene Starwind on Feb 23, 2007 18:16:39 GMT -5
Moving is retarded unless you're in the NL central and want to go to the AL west.
|
|