|
|
MIL/ATL
May 21, 2006 23:49:35 GMT -5
Post by GoldSlime35 on May 21, 2006 23:49:35 GMT -5
Veto, even with the salary, the difference between them is not a 4.5 spec.
The new guy is getting ripped off here.
|
|
|
|
MIL/ATL
May 21, 2006 23:50:09 GMT -5
Post by Brian on May 21, 2006 23:50:09 GMT -5
If your trade passes then this should pass >_>
|
|
|
|
MIL/ATL
May 22, 2006 0:15:58 GMT -5
Post by Dave on May 22, 2006 0:15:58 GMT -5
that's why i vetoed it... if zack gets ripped off i will NEVER hear the end of it
|
|
|
|
MIL/ATL
May 22, 2006 0:26:17 GMT -5
Post by Dankbud on May 22, 2006 0:26:17 GMT -5
If your trade passes then this should pass >_> but the difference here is that a new owners is involved. equal value is much more important when it comes to a new owner than an experienced one. that's how they get a feel for what is fair and what isn't. |
|
|
|
MIL/ATL
May 22, 2006 0:29:07 GMT -5
Post by Jabroni on May 22, 2006 0:29:07 GMT -5
just pass it so i don't have to waste my time adding some jackass who won't develop anyway
|
|
|
|
MIL/ATL
May 22, 2006 0:38:02 GMT -5
Post by Dankbud on May 22, 2006 0:38:02 GMT -5
i am gonna veto it. hardy has only 2 years left and milwaukee does have plenty of cap room so a salary dump really doesn't help him. and it certainly isn't worth a 4.5 even if it is a crappy 4.5 spec.
|
|
|
|
MIL/ATL
May 22, 2006 0:43:40 GMT -5
Post by Jabroni on May 22, 2006 0:43:40 GMT -5
time to find a jackass w ho will never develop anyway
|
|
|
|
MIL/ATL
May 22, 2006 0:55:57 GMT -5
Post by Scott on May 22, 2006 0:55:57 GMT -5
thats the spirit!
|
|
|
|
MIL/ATL
May 22, 2006 1:00:33 GMT -5
Post by Jabroni on May 22, 2006 1:00:33 GMT -5
god my farm doesn't even have anyone like that
|
|
zack
Junior Member
Milwaukee Brewers
Posts: 77
|
MIL/ATL
May 22, 2006 13:49:34 GMT -5
Post by zack on May 22, 2006 13:49:34 GMT -5
JJ Hardy is a joke
|
|
|
|
MIL/ATL
May 22, 2006 13:54:07 GMT -5
Post by The Boss on May 22, 2006 13:54:07 GMT -5
Furcal isn't much better.
|
|
zack
Junior Member
Milwaukee Brewers
Posts: 77
|
MIL/ATL
May 22, 2006 15:33:20 GMT -5
Post by zack on May 22, 2006 15:33:20 GMT -5
Year G AB H 2B 3B HR RBI R BB HP SF K SB CS AVG OBP SLG OPS
2011 132 434 114 27 2 10 44 60 54 1 3 91 2 1 .263 .343 .403 .747 Hardy vs.
2011 153 625 180 32 13 24 95 103 51 1 4 49 50 29 .288 .341 .496 .837 Furcal
how can you say they are almost equal
|
|
|
|
MIL/ATL
May 22, 2006 15:42:54 GMT -5
Post by The Boss on May 22, 2006 15:42:54 GMT -5
Because that's only one year and you were giving up a sweet spec as well?
|
|
|
|
MIL/ATL
May 22, 2006 15:50:06 GMT -5
Post by Dave on May 22, 2006 15:50:06 GMT -5
hardy still managed a better obp than furcal  |
|
|
|
MIL/ATL
May 22, 2006 18:34:28 GMT -5
Post by Dave on May 22, 2006 18:34:28 GMT -5
on second thought i think that a lot of people just read zack's post and licked their lips
|
|
