|
Post by Phoenix on Feb 28, 2006 22:08:09 GMT -5
But Mota is worth little value. little value > no value
|
|
|
Post by Jabroni on Feb 28, 2006 22:47:50 GMT -5
Old Guillermo Mota is still going to do a whole lot more with his career than the two guys you're giving up. Because Gene continues to trade for these guys because they never turn out to be anything useful for him, right?
|
|
|
Post by Jabroni on Feb 28, 2006 22:48:24 GMT -5
$3M for the next three years = negative value
|
|
|
Post by GBPackersfan on Feb 28, 2006 23:46:06 GMT -5
Pass, not even a debate. The salary negates what little value Mota has, therefore making it an even trade.
|
|
|
Post by Gene Starwind on Mar 1, 2006 17:13:13 GMT -5
wtf, why was this vetoed.
|
|
|
Post by Dankbud on Mar 1, 2006 17:24:00 GMT -5
your trade with gene might as well be you giving him nothing because that is exactly what those 2 players have amounted to and will ever amount to.
|
|