|
|
Post by MagicMerlin7 on Oct 29, 2006 1:51:09 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Are you ready? on Oct 29, 2006 10:30:55 GMT -5
Eh...
I don't know. Beechem for Remole + money seems fair, but although it seems he'll be useless, Garcia could develop into something.
I'll pass for now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dwight Schrute on Oct 29, 2006 18:32:05 GMT -5
I'm going to have to veto. Knight's younger and in my opinion better than Remole. Plus Garcia could turn into at worst a backup MIF, which has some value.
|
|
|
|
Post by MagicMerlin7 on Oct 29, 2006 20:39:35 GMT -5
Pass
Remole's a good hitter and Arizona needs to help out its offense. Giving up a good pitcher and a spec that might never develop is worth it.
|
|
|
|
Post by MagicMerlin7 on Oct 31, 2006 1:14:15 GMT -5
The votes are only 2 pass, 1 veto. It's first to 3 votes so a couple more votes should do it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dwight Schrute on Oct 31, 2006 1:17:00 GMT -5
I'm going to change my vote to just abstain, unless you absolutely need the vote. My opinion still stands, but I don't want there to be a cloud of bias over my head because the trade could hurt my chances. I just don't think it's right for me to vote on it.
|
|
|
|
Post by GBPackersfan on Oct 31, 2006 17:15:43 GMT -5
if this is pending for one more sim i'm putting myself on the council
|
|
|
|
Post by Bacon Drips on Oct 31, 2006 17:43:52 GMT -5
Yeah come on fuck
|
|
|
|
Post by Dwight Schrute on Oct 31, 2006 20:23:07 GMT -5
I'd say just go by there should be rule that a trade goes through even if it doesn't have the required votes if so many sims pass. Or we might need to rework the council to get more active members.
|
|
|
|
Post by MagicMerlin7 on Nov 1, 2006 2:09:34 GMT -5
I had a two day rule, which is why this trade passes right now.
|
|
