|
Post by MagicMerlin7 on Oct 18, 2006 3:29:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Dwight Schrute on Oct 18, 2006 18:08:08 GMT -5
I'll pass, both are experienced GMs, so I assume they know what they're doing.
|
|
|
Post by Are you ready? on Oct 18, 2006 18:22:56 GMT -5
Pass. Philly wins, obviously, but Hendrickson's contract is ass, Rollins is pretty good, and Denson is a very solid RP spec.
|
|
|
Post by Dave on Oct 18, 2006 21:38:41 GMT -5
the condition sets a bad, bad precedent. i'll veto it because i know personally if this passes, i'm going to come up with the most retarded shit just to get trades to go through.
|
|
|
Post by MagicMerlin7 on Oct 19, 2006 2:03:28 GMT -5
This was a tough descision. On one hand, there's that terrible condition that I'm not a fan of. On the other hand GS has been trying to get rid of Hendrickson for a while.
I'm gonna pass it, but if there's goind to be a conditional trade, it has to be simple (in this case, if Hendrickson gets two hits in a season) and a player has a terrible contract.
|
|
|
Post by GoldSlime35 on Oct 19, 2006 2:11:04 GMT -5
Yeah...I kinda suggested it as a joke, then Gene forced me to keep it in there. Its kinda pointless because a 3.0 spec is useless and I'm not even sure if the league lasts 4 more seasons.
As for the wording, its impossible to define "aging hits", so thats what I came up with.
|
|
|
Post by GoldSlime35 on Oct 19, 2006 2:23:57 GMT -5
Oh, and reason I wanted him gone is so I could use Coleman.
And free up cap room to resign Felix of course.
|
|