|
|
ATL/CLE
Apr 29, 2006 10:23:30 GMT -5
Post by Dankbud on Apr 29, 2006 10:23:30 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
ATL/CLE
Apr 29, 2006 11:13:26 GMT -5
Post by Dave on Apr 29, 2006 11:13:26 GMT -5
neither hepner or stephenson are/will be very good, adams is old and massively underdeveloped, and that pick will suck.
veto
|
|
|
|
ATL/CLE
Apr 29, 2006 11:21:23 GMT -5
Post by Dankbud on Apr 29, 2006 11:21:23 GMT -5
i hate to veto trades but we are looking at 2 players that are very underdeveloped for thier age (25 which gives them very little time to make it), 1 player that isnt very good and a pick that will be in the 20s.
but hafner is in the last year of his contract.
|
|
|
|
ATL/CLE
Apr 29, 2006 11:26:45 GMT -5
Post by Zappa on Apr 29, 2006 11:26:45 GMT -5
But Hafner has average loyalty, which means he's resignable.
|
|
|
|
ATL/CLE
Apr 29, 2006 11:31:08 GMT -5
Post by Dave on Apr 29, 2006 11:31:08 GMT -5
and even if he can't re-sign him, he can franchise him, and either get hafner or a good prospect
|
|
|
|
ATL/CLE
Apr 29, 2006 15:56:31 GMT -5
Post by Jabroni on Apr 29, 2006 15:56:31 GMT -5
he's getting a first round pick also
plus, I don't even need Hafner next year
|
|
|
|
ATL/CLE
Apr 29, 2006 15:57:59 GMT -5
Post by Jabroni on Apr 29, 2006 15:57:59 GMT -5
similar pick got me a great 2B...
|
|
|
|
ATL/CLE
Apr 29, 2006 16:14:56 GMT -5
Post by Dave on Apr 29, 2006 16:14:56 GMT -5
a) there's no guarantee that next year's draft class will be as good as whichever one you got a great 2B in
b) arguing for your trade in your own thread ftl
|
|
|
|
ATL/CLE
Apr 29, 2006 16:46:51 GMT -5
Post by Jabroni on Apr 29, 2006 16:46:51 GMT -5
1) Dank said you can trade draft picks and you can't argue against them on that basis. Plus, this guy isn't exactly a superstar www.dankootp.com/p748.html2) worked for me for other trades |
|
|
|
ATL/CLE
Apr 30, 2006 4:05:56 GMT -5
Post by Billy "The Boss" Beane on Apr 30, 2006 4:05:56 GMT -5
It favors Atlanta but I dont think it's that bad.
|
|
