|
LAD/DET
Mar 11, 2006 3:22:28 GMT -5
Post by Dankbud on Mar 11, 2006 3:22:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
LAD/DET
Mar 11, 2006 3:34:06 GMT -5
Post by GoldSlime35 on Mar 11, 2006 3:34:06 GMT -5
Zappa already has two good 1Bs...why the fuck does he want a third?
|
|
|
LAD/DET
Mar 11, 2006 3:45:06 GMT -5
Post by Phoenix on Mar 11, 2006 3:45:06 GMT -5
Zappa already has two good 1Bs...why the fuck does he want a third? not to mention trading worthless relievers. Well, Pilk is mediocre, so he has a little value I guess. I wanna see what Zappa has to say about the 1B thing.
|
|
|
LAD/DET
Mar 11, 2006 4:27:58 GMT -5
Post by Jabroni on Mar 11, 2006 4:27:58 GMT -5
Zappa already has two good 1Bs...why the fuck does he want a third? look who's talking
|
|
|
LAD/DET
Mar 11, 2006 9:33:02 GMT -5
Post by Zappa on Mar 11, 2006 9:33:02 GMT -5
I'm not resigning Choi.
Adams makes a great backup, and will play on days when Samson rests. Heck, if Samson starts underperforming, I'll platoon them both.
|
|
|
LAD/DET
Mar 11, 2006 12:12:57 GMT -5
Post by Dwight Schrute on Mar 11, 2006 12:12:57 GMT -5
If Sequeiros gets anywhere near his full potential, he outclasses everyone in this trade. It seems to me that Samson, Raburn, and Ciles are basically the same guy, with Samson being quite better in discipline. I don't think you build an offense around any of those players, but I guess if you already have Kyser, you might just need to compliment him. I think there is a chance that Sequeiros could bust though, so with that I say "pass". Still, I think this trade will come back to bite Zappa on the ass but if he agrees to it I don't see why it shouldn't be passed. Wish he wouldn't have traded him to someone in my division.
|
|
|
LAD/DET
Mar 11, 2006 13:05:15 GMT -5
Post by The Boss on Mar 11, 2006 13:05:15 GMT -5
Phail.
|
|
|
LAD/DET
Mar 11, 2006 13:06:08 GMT -5
Post by GoldSlime35 on Mar 11, 2006 13:06:08 GMT -5
Zappa already has two good 1Bs...why the fuck does he want a third? look who's talking While I have like 10 eligible 1Bs, they can all play other positions, excluding Bucky and Harvey. But 3 good 1B only guys is pointless.
|
|
|
LAD/DET
Mar 11, 2006 13:45:20 GMT -5
Post by Phoenix on Mar 11, 2006 13:45:20 GMT -5
well, like CWS said, it balances out. So if Zappa wants to do something stupid, I'm not going to stop him.
Have fun Zappa, pass.
|
|
|
LAD/DET
Mar 11, 2006 14:16:58 GMT -5
Post by Zappa on Mar 11, 2006 14:16:58 GMT -5
If Sequeiros gets anywhere near his full potential, he outclasses everyone in this trade. It seems to me that Samson, Raburn, and Ciles are basically the same guy, with Samson being quite better in discipline. I don't think you build an offense around any of those players, but I guess if you already have Kyser, you might just need to compliment him. I think there is a chance that Sequeiros could bust though, so with that I say "pass". Still, I think this trade will come back to bite Zappa on the ass but if he agrees to it I don't see why it shouldn't be passed. Wish he wouldn't have traded him to someone in my division. The reason I've failed in winning in the last 5 seasons is that I DON'T have anyone to compliment Kyser. People with good/decent eye and can get on base. I'm building this trade around Kyser Sequeiros won't fully develop. He'll reach his contact and gap, but his power and especially his eye is questionable. Phoenix, I don't see how this is a stupid trade.
|
|
|
LAD/DET
Mar 11, 2006 14:29:39 GMT -5
Post by Zappa on Mar 11, 2006 14:29:39 GMT -5
Fine, w/e. Dank, veto or pass on however you feel.
|
|
|
LAD/DET
Mar 11, 2006 15:33:26 GMT -5
Post by GoldSlime35 on Mar 11, 2006 15:33:26 GMT -5
Its stupid because Samson is a 1B...any other position, and its a great trade for you.
|
|
|
LAD/DET
Mar 11, 2006 18:22:18 GMT -5
Post by Zappa on Mar 11, 2006 18:22:18 GMT -5
But I need a second power hitter to compliment Kyser. >_< Should I trade for another position if I add in another player?
|
|
|
LAD/DET
Mar 11, 2006 23:59:44 GMT -5
Post by Dankbud on Mar 11, 2006 23:59:44 GMT -5
rayburn and burroughs are of equal value, almost the same player. the 2 RPs don't even matter.
this trade is pretty much sequeiros for 2 adam dunns. since sequeiros is so far away from being mlb ready i am going to pass this trade despite it making little sense for zappa.
|
|
|
LAD/DET
Mar 12, 2006 0:25:10 GMT -5
Post by Zappa on Mar 12, 2006 0:25:10 GMT -5
No arguement here, but why does it make little sense? Is it the whole 1B thing?
|
|