|
Post by Dankbud on Feb 20, 2006 14:17:08 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by REX PENNEBAKER on Feb 20, 2006 15:07:55 GMT -5
Pass I guess.
|
|
|
Post by Phoenix on Feb 20, 2006 15:42:55 GMT -5
Unless the 10th pick is going to land some really high quality talent this is a veto.
|
|
|
Post by GoldSlime35 on Feb 20, 2006 16:11:48 GMT -5
Pass if the pick will yield a guy better than Dallas, veto otherwise.
After looking, the pick looks to be a guy with about the same value as Dallas. So I can live with it I guess.
|
|
|
Post by Phoenix on Feb 20, 2006 16:41:52 GMT -5
Pass if the pick will yield a guy better than Dallas, veto otherwise. After looking, the pick looks to be a guy with about the same value as Dallas. So I can live with it I guess. that's pretty much what I was getting at. I'll look at the specs later.
|
|
|
Post by The Boss on Feb 20, 2006 16:49:43 GMT -5
The pick's gonna be a 5 star guy whether he goes pitching or hitting.
|
|
|
Post by Phoenix on Feb 20, 2006 17:42:32 GMT -5
The pick's gonna be a 5 star guy whether he goes pitching or hitting. stars are a horrible way to judge people. That 4.5 reliever is horrible as a reliever, and inadaquate as a starter.
|
|
|
Post by Dankbud on Feb 20, 2006 19:19:05 GMT -5
there are 14 legit 5.0 specs in this draft.
|
|
|
Post by The Boss on Feb 20, 2006 20:22:19 GMT -5
Screw it, deal's off.
|
|
|
Post by Dankbud on Feb 20, 2006 20:49:56 GMT -5
its only off if FLA agree to it being off.
|
|
|
Post by The Boss on Feb 20, 2006 20:51:14 GMT -5
That's illogical.
|
|
|
Post by Dankbud on Feb 20, 2006 21:53:29 GMT -5
you both agreed to the deal. once it is posted it cannot be renegged unless hte circumstances call for it. whic h they dont in this case.
|
|
|
Post by GoldSlime35 on Feb 20, 2006 22:11:54 GMT -5
why do you want to cancel it anyway?
|
|
|
Post by The Boss on Feb 20, 2006 23:18:35 GMT -5
I think I'd prefer the pick. Oh well, no big deal either way.
|
|
|
Post by magiblade on Feb 21, 2006 0:05:43 GMT -5
No cancel.
|
|