|
|
New FA
Dec 9, 2006 18:14:22 GMT -5
Post by MagicMerlin7 on Dec 9, 2006 18:14:22 GMT -5
I originally signed these guys to to extensions a month ago for the ownerless teams, when I saw that Baltimore, Tampa Bay, and Boston didn't have owners and some good FA were going to be on the market. Since they do now, and have locked up some key free agents, I'll take away some extensions I signed.
Nick Swisher - OAK
Carlos Quentin - PIT
Alvin Florian - DET
|
|
|
|
New FA
Dec 9, 2006 18:16:54 GMT -5
Post by GoldSlime35 on Dec 9, 2006 18:16:54 GMT -5
If you are going to do crap like that then we might as well contract 6 teams. You are pretty much ruining any shot of them getting GMs.
|
|
|
|
New FA
Dec 9, 2006 18:30:21 GMT -5
Post by MagicMerlin7 on Dec 9, 2006 18:30:21 GMT -5
I was going to let Pennebaker, Santana, and Young walk. So this just changes the FA that I wouldn't sign to extensions. Ruining any shot of them getting gms? They'll get better draft picks, have more money to spend, and its not like these teams would be able to compete during the life of the contracts (Swisher's 3 year deal in which he's 38 at the end, and Quentin and Florian's 2 year deals).
|
|
|
|
New FA
Dec 9, 2006 22:43:46 GMT -5
Post by Brian on Dec 9, 2006 22:43:46 GMT -5
Draft picks haven't done shit for me :/
Every single player i've drafted in the top 10 or 5 hasn't developed one single bit except for Caruthers, and he might take a few hits next year anyways.
|
|
|
|
New FA
Dec 9, 2006 23:27:18 GMT -5
Post by Dave on Dec 9, 2006 23:27:18 GMT -5
Aw come on Merlin, what's wrong with letting some good free agents hit the market every year  |
|
|
|
New FA
Dec 10, 2006 1:06:35 GMT -5
Post by GBPackersfan on Dec 10, 2006 1:06:35 GMT -5
we should contract seattle imo
|
|
|
|
New FA
Dec 11, 2006 15:46:25 GMT -5
Post by Bacon Drips on Dec 11, 2006 15:46:25 GMT -5
we should contract seattle imo |
|
